Author Topic: Opinions about ADW Modula  (Read 23621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #15 on: August 05, 2013, 11:41:50 AM »
i guess thats correct. i use - only when i need - with little work translated free pascal win header files.

Example:


Freepascal:
Code: [Select]
function SetFilePointer(hFile:HANDLE; lDistanceToMove:LONG; lpDistanceToMoveHigh:PLONG; dwMoveMethod:DWORD):DWORD; external 'kernel32' name 'SetFilePointer';
Modula.
Code: [Select]
PROCEDURE SetFilePointer(hFile : HANDLE;
                         lDistanceToMove : LONG;
                         lpDistanceToMoveHigh : PLONG;
                         dwMoveMethod : DWORD) : DWORD;


But i don't need windows gui to much, so i don't care. the \ADW Software Modula-2\advapidef has windows etc. header for portability to apple and i use those mostly (see http://modula2.awiedemann.de/). its the rest of the language, its modules, oop and generics is what i care for.
when you look at the \ADW Software Modula-2\examples directory, you find all the easy demos to make dlls etc, and the module def's and mod's show how to change and add win headers.
i attach a module, no cleaned up though, to have graphic in pascal/bgi style.
sorry forgot to mention that there is coco (parser generator) that need and miss for pb etc.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2013, 12:06:51 PM by Richard Koch »

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #16 on: August 05, 2013, 11:48:59 AM »
there is one alternative other language that i kind of use sometimes (x86/x64 compiler):
dlanguage - http://dlang.org/
but it suck when it comes to windows etc., but it is VS integratable (http://wiki.dlang.org/Open_Source_Projects). if modula is nothering for some people, maybe they like this.

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2013, 01:16:05 PM »
As information:

Version 2.74 - August 2, 2013

    Corrected ResEdit
    Added Unicode support to library
    Correction in debugger when using Generic modules
    Correction of usage of arrays in Generic modules
    WinShell.mod: multiple corrections
    64-bit code generation when using DIV and MOD on 8-bit values

Download ADWm2.74.zip  http://www.modula2.org/adwm2/ADWm2.74.zip

Online Theo Gottwald

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • User-Rate: +30/-4
  • Gender: Male
    • it-berater
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2013, 08:03:52 PM »
Richard, where can i find the first steps - NOT on Mosula, but on HOW to use the IDE, and just the "HOW TO".
Just how to compile "Hello world" and make a EXE file out of it.
I could not find that nowhere.

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #19 on: August 08, 2013, 08:19:01 AM »
the help file of the compiler content and index -> then select what you like to know. on the language etc consult http://www.modula2.org/.


Online Theo Gottwald

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • User-Rate: +30/-4
  • Gender: Male
    • it-berater
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2013, 10:19:52 AM »
Ok, the compiler Help-File.
Its a bit short on explaining the concept but possibly all things needed are there.
Where did you learn it?

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #21 on: August 08, 2013, 01:39:29 PM »
this may sound stupid, but i read the help, tried the examples and started to write then my own modules. I am sure you did that with pb too.

Online Theo Gottwald

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • User-Rate: +30/-4
  • Gender: Male
    • it-berater
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #22 on: August 08, 2013, 07:03:21 PM »
I started with PB ... was it 3 or 5 .. its so long ago.
At that time i just wrote the program - and pressed compile.
And the result worked.
Thinking back it seemed to be sooo easy ....

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2013, 07:35:58 AM »
yes i believe that. this is easy too and i thought the same way with modula. i think the hardest part is, that the thinking compared to PB is different. But when you compare it to PureB, then modula has a clear cut syntax, where as with PureB the syntax is ugly as hell. The Mod. compiler being a long, long time in the field has a minimum of bugs. you can see that easily on the update times they have. but also you should consider, that there are real, sold and serious programs made with modula and with PureB???

Online Theo Gottwald

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • User-Rate: +30/-4
  • Gender: Male
    • it-berater
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2013, 08:56:03 AM »
I trust you on that Richard.
Actually if i have something to do - of course i still use PB because i know how to do it.
I'll have to take time and go through the help and see how to make things in Modula.
How do you make GUI's?
Is there a visual Designer available somewhere?
I understood it right, that Modula can really mak x64 DLL's and EXE's?

Offline Richard Koch

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • User-Rate: +6/-0
Re: Opinions about ADW Modula
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2013, 12:59:55 PM »
The compiler will make 32/64 bit dll's and exe's, but i don't use 32 bit anymore - nobody wants it.
You can debug 32/64 bit dll's and exe's.
Unfortunately there is no gui builder, but thats not so bad. it is easy to use \ADW Software Modula-2\advapidef to make one. There is also FormEditUI which is very handy to use.