Zlatko Vid
but you were the one complaining about the people I didn't come to the O2, I just pointed out possible causes and possible solutions.
I also like O2 and I wanted it to grow more,
but if it's not the will of the creator "Charles" there's no reason to argue about it.
I don't like C either, with that bunch of {([])};<<>>!==&&:: and I don't know what else, and that includes the others that have this syntax.
I always get lost if I'm in the middle of the "for", in the middle of the "if" and which one. structuring the logic of what I'm doing with this is not for me.
I could also have gone to freebasic which has a more stable project, but at first I couldn't even make it work, imagine creating a dll, I thought I was very dumb but I saw reports of others with the same problem on their forum, until I found out the O2 that was already there to compile and create the dll directly without much headache to make it work, then I got addicted to O2 and I didn't even try to learn freebasic since I didn't even have great needs.
Of course, sometimes I get angry because simple things that worked before don't work anymore in a more current version of O2.
about name change if it were to continue with greater stability between versions, it would be a divider.
today it is not known for which version some examples posted on the forum were written and you can get something and it just doesn't work. with a name change this would no longer happen because it would be known that the example was written for that project.